Warning: Declaration of TarskiCommentWalker::start_lvl(&$output, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Comment::start_lvl(&$output, $depth = 0, $args = Array) in /home/turkeycreeklane/public_html/wp-content/themes/tarski/library/classes/comment_walker.php on line 109

Warning: Declaration of TarskiCommentWalker::start_el(&$output, $comment, $depth, $args) should be compatible with Walker_Comment::start_el(&$output, $comment, $depth = 0, $args = Array, $id = 0) in /home/turkeycreeklane/public_html/wp-content/themes/tarski/library/classes/comment_walker.php on line 109

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/turkeycreeklane/public_html/wp-content/themes/tarski/library/classes/comment_walker.php:109) in /home/turkeycreeklane/public_html/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: What I’m reading https://www.turkeycreeklane.com Rural life, recipes, animals & gardening Thu, 13 Apr 2017 12:38:20 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.5.6 By: jolynna https://www.turkeycreeklane.com/?page_id=65#comment-184 Sat, 01 Dec 2007 22:35:15 +0000 http://www.turkeycreeklane.com/?page_id=65#comment-184 Hi ellaella,

I saw the Times list and I absolutely agree that they got it backwards! I also agree with Merrimerri that the Diana Chronicles seem biased.

I enjoyed them both, though.

By: ellaella https://www.turkeycreeklane.com/?page_id=65#comment-187 Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:07:46 +0000 http://www.turkeycreeklane.com/?page_id=65#comment-187 I’ve read A Woman in Charge and The Diana Chronicles. Enjoyed them both but was astonished when the Times came out with its notable books of the year last week that Tina Brown’s made the list but Carl Bernstein’s did not. I think they got it backwards. Totally.

By: merrimerri https://www.turkeycreeklane.com/?page_id=65#comment-157 Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:19:07 +0000 http://www.turkeycreeklane.com/?page_id=65#comment-157 Yikes I forgot to spell check..lol
Yes do let me know what you think of it!

By: merrimerri https://www.turkeycreeklane.com/?page_id=65#comment-156 Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:18:32 +0000 http://www.turkeycreeklane.com/?page_id=65#comment-156 I know, Diana was SO beautiful and the quintissetial princess, it sure hurt us all when we realised how horrible her, “happily ever after”, really was..
Yes it has been a while since I read it, but I know it seemed very biased.

By: jolynna https://www.turkeycreeklane.com/?page_id=65#comment-159 Sat, 04 Aug 2007 21:07:16 +0000 http://www.turkeycreeklane.com/?page_id=65#comment-159 Hi Merrimerri,

I’m kind of a royal fanatic, too.

I’ve always been so much in awe of Diana, I can’t imagine how anyone could be more regal or beautiful, it is hard to understand Charle’s eye roving in the direction it did. (But that’s just my opinion)

Thanks for your review. I will let you know what I think after I read it.

From what you said, it sounds like the author may have been doing damage control toward one party by trying to tarnish the reputation of the other.

By: merrimerri https://www.turkeycreeklane.com/?page_id=65#comment-158 Sat, 04 Aug 2007 20:34:58 +0000 http://www.turkeycreeklane.com/?page_id=65#comment-158 I read the Diana chronicles..
(I have been a royal fanatic for years)
It was a very sad story but the book rather sensationalizes all the “juicy details”; dwelling lovingly on Diana’s insecurities and anorexia.
My goodness if anyone was to discover that their “Prince Charming” was actually a two timing jerk still carrying on with the Rottweiler on one’s wedding day, then they should be allowed to be a bit anxious and insecure!